Day 3321 of one photograph every day for the rest of my life.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f315f/f315f79d50e6e8789a838fbacdedb65e21b2064e" alt=""
On this date six years ago (day 1130 of one photo every day): Maria on Mustique
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81e28/81e28d7dec8b97032d537f0a4bc19ecde4533bf4" alt=""
Day 3321 of one photograph every day for the rest of my life.
On this date six years ago (day 1130 of one photo every day): Maria on Mustique
Today I’m shooting a very high acutance, essentially grainless, film called Adox. The results are remarkable – the downside is that it’s rated at ISO 20 but is closer to ISO 12, so it’s full sunlight or a tripod. The clear base also has a nasty curl, making it a challenge to scan.
Anyway, here’s a gallery of film shots.
Day 2,966 of one photograph every day for the rest of my life.
On this date two years ago (day 2,263): Sporting clays
Day 2,958 of one photograph every day for the rest of my life.
On this date last year (day 2,593): Blizzard
Take a look back at the post for February 9. The vertical line up the middle of the picture is actually a scratch on the negative. Very irritating. Another issue with film. I’m reposting the image here with the scratch repaired and minor edits. Film helps make this image appealing because its response curve has a “shoulder” that prevents the windows from blowing out entirely, and “halation” (light diffusing through the film’s base) add a glow around the windows. On the other hand the scratch illustrates one of the key hazards with film. Overall I spent 20 minutes or so spotting the scanned negative in Photoshop.
On this day one year ago: Lexington Avenue at night. Not one of my more popular images – probably because the reflections (which was the appeal of the situation for me) are confusing.
On this day one year ago: Blizzard.
And . . . here’s FILM:
On this day last year: Racquet and Tennis Club.